Wednesday, October 04, 2006

The proof is in the putty

I didn't really notice this one but it makes sense. Ol' Scarlett was the plainest Jane in Ghostworld and then all of a sudden she looked amazing...much like Angelina when Tomb Raider came out. The reason for both of the beauties' transformation has been course, some subtle but costly hammering around.
'Tis a slow news day folks.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

at

7 comments:

  1. DrDiSaia1:22 am

    Well as someone who likes to "hammer around" I still think she looks great. Nice nose.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous2:28 am

    I really don't see a difference in her nose from the first pic to the last, except for some better makeup and lighting. I think she has remained fairly untouched,and perhaps now can just afford a good eyebrow and makeup job now. Very refreshing!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous5:29 am

    I don't hate Scarlett, but I definitely don't see what's so great about her acting, fer chrissake. She's so dull, suppressed....so blah!

    And I don't see this "great beauty" thing either. I just don't see it. I mean she's pretty, but I don't see the beautiful, old-Hollywood-glamour thing with her.

    ReplyDelete
  4. moxy11:23 am

    Do recall how old she was/is: it looks like she's also lost quite a bit of the baby fat in her face.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous3:43 pm

    Do you loose baby fat in your nose too?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous5:58 am

    cheek implants? check

    rhino? check

    blepheroplasty? check

    resurfacing? check

    Pics don't lie - and no you don't "grow cheekbones" from teens to 20s.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous12:21 am

    Erm, actually, you do. I did. That, and the sharpie nose. And my family can definitely not afford plastic surgery.

    ReplyDelete