Would it be the beautifully applied blusher in the second picture or the impressive way they managed to style and arrange the nylon goodness strapped to her head???
Put it this way, there's a weird irony to the fact that three of the four articles advertised on the front cover of the magazine mention skin, skincare products and hair. All of which have very little relation to the REAL Ms. Spears!! I bet the layout artist died laughing!!!
Ya know, the more I see this kind of thing, the more I want to get my graphics degree and learn all the Photoshop tricks of the trade. There's Gold In Them Thar [Hollywood] Hills!!!
heehee - if her name was not on the cover, I would never have guessed it was her. She should include photoshop in her budget. Or rather, she already includes it.
I am so mad at Allure for putting that piece of trash on the cover. It was on Yahoo! that she only should up for the photo shoot and flaked on the interview. So, she acts like that and they celebrate this childish behavior by putting her on the cover? It's ridiculous.
Dear Sylive Remember, Allure has to sell magazines. I wouldn't slam them too hard for putting her on the cover. The only reward BS (gotta love her initials) got was whatever fee her agent worked out for the photo session... Pax, N.
Nah. Vaseline can only do so much. Photoshop can do anything! LOL.
ReplyDeleteOh now where to begin???
ReplyDeleteWould it be the beautifully applied blusher in the second picture or the impressive way they managed to style and arrange the nylon goodness strapped to her head???
Put it this way, there's a weird irony to the fact that three of the four articles advertised on the front cover of the magazine mention skin, skincare products and hair. All of which have very little relation to the REAL Ms. Spears!! I bet the layout artist died laughing!!!
Ya know, the more I see this kind of thing, the more I want to get my graphics degree and learn all the Photoshop tricks of the trade. There's Gold In Them Thar [Hollywood] Hills!!!
Brilliant!!!
Take care,
~Nate. xxx
I kind of like the Mother/son shot. Shows a human side of her I'd not really seen before.
ReplyDeletePax,
N.
heehee - if her name was not on the cover, I would never have guessed it was her. She should include photoshop in her budget. Or rather, she already includes it.
ReplyDeleteF r a n c i
Did you notice that she leaves the tags on her son's clothing as well?
ReplyDeleteI seem to remember photos of her wearing clothes with tags hanging off the back.
Can she not afford scissors???
she is a reck and a pile of white american trash!
ReplyDeleteHa... "reck" indeed, Babes...
ReplyDeleteI am so mad at Allure for putting that piece of trash on the cover. It was on Yahoo! that she only should up for the photo shoot and flaked on the interview. So, she acts like that and they celebrate this childish behavior by putting her on the cover? It's ridiculous.
ReplyDeleteHEY, it's the magazine's who decide on retouching not the celebrity! Also, she looks pretty in the picture below (aside from her hair).
ReplyDeleteDear Sylive
ReplyDeleteRemember, Allure has to sell magazines. I wouldn't slam them too hard for putting her on the cover. The only reward BS (gotta love her initials) got was whatever fee her agent worked out for the photo session...
Pax,
N.
Boy bright daylight hates her like no one else.
ReplyDelete