The blog and chronicles of the crashing bores we'd 'much rather kick in the eye'.
Monday, September 18, 2006
What the hell is Cindy Crawford doing?
I don't know. She certainly doesn't need the money. This is her daughter Kaia...she's 5. Perhaps I'm just cynical and overreacting...but this shoot really. really. disturbs me. What is she thinking?
not a good way to get back in the spotlight. i don't know why anyone would take pictures like that of your 5-year old, but to put them in the public eye is just creepy, desperate and pathetic.
Is that a (hopefully fake) tramp stamp on her lower back? Ewwwww
ReplyDeletePoor beautiful girl. She clearly resembles her mother but I hope she lets the kid decide about her fate herself.
ReplyDeleteYeah that is creepy. mostly the 1st pic.
ReplyDeleteI get a sick child porn vibe from this shoot. Esp. the fake tattoo..and no shirt. SHES 5
ReplyDeleteWhat was the kid's name again, JonBenet?
ReplyDeleteCool, cuz I never EVER could stand Cindy, begining back in the 80's!!!!! Damn airhead.
ReplyDeleteNot cool cuz yes this is very creepy!!! I mean, OK keep the creepy pix WITHIN your family's abode only & it's maybe OK; but these??
They so clearly appear to be made for public consumption. There's so much detectable ego coming from the photographer.
I wonder if years of being pictorally available has made Cindy, aka Dumb-Dumb, numb to the impropriety of these pix?
when your career is over, you can always porn out your kid, right?
ReplyDeleteYes, this is creepy.
ReplyDeletenot a good way to get back in the spotlight. i don't know why anyone would take pictures like that of your 5-year old, but to put them in the public eye is just creepy, desperate and pathetic.
ReplyDeleteOH my! That's VERY creepy. Wouldn't John Mark Karr and his creepy kind would love it?! Shame on Cindy Crawford and Stever Gerber!!!!!
ReplyDelete