'Tis a slow news day folks.
Wednesday, October 04, 2006
The proof is in the putty
I didn't really notice this one but it makes sense. Ol' Scarlett was the plainest Jane in Ghostworld and then all of a sudden she looked amazing...much like Angelina when Tomb Raider came out. The reason for both of the beauties' transformation has been course, some subtle but costly hammering around.
'Tis a slow news day folks.
'Tis a slow news day folks.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Well as someone who likes to "hammer around" I still think she looks great. Nice nose.
I really don't see a difference in her nose from the first pic to the last, except for some better makeup and lighting. I think she has remained fairly untouched,and perhaps now can just afford a good eyebrow and makeup job now. Very refreshing!
I don't hate Scarlett, but I definitely don't see what's so great about her acting, fer chrissake. She's so dull, suppressed....so blah!
And I don't see this "great beauty" thing either. I just don't see it. I mean she's pretty, but I don't see the beautiful, old-Hollywood-glamour thing with her.
Do recall how old she was/is: it looks like she's also lost quite a bit of the baby fat in her face.
Do you loose baby fat in your nose too?
cheek implants? check
rhino? check
blepheroplasty? check
resurfacing? check
Pics don't lie - and no you don't "grow cheekbones" from teens to 20s.
Erm, actually, you do. I did. That, and the sharpie nose. And my family can definitely not afford plastic surgery.
Post a Comment