Thursday, January 04, 2007

W magazine low on ideas?

I don't know if I like the cover. He looks odd and she looks too perfect and it just doesn't seem to work for me. It also bears too much of a striking resemblance to the "other" W photoshoot...

umm..also, (refer to her face in B&W picture)...is that the reason that Kidman was married to Cruise for so long? Maybe that's why she likes to marry gay men.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

I don't understand what you're saying. What's her face doing? Is Urban gay?

GrinforGrin said...

I think the B&W of Kidman/Craig looks like a frame capture from a video, not an actual pro still shot. and in the colour photo she's shopped too much and he isn't shopped enough. they may have been going for a 'craggy guy/perfect female' effect but they went Way overboard

Anonymous said...

I think they look hot together...craig is yum yum...I love Nicole too...such a great actress...

Anonymous said...

I also don't see it? ...except she doesn't look terribly interested.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, I don't get what you're saying, either, Elisa.

Anonymous said...

i think elisa might be refering to the fact that nicole looks bored as hell. maybe? if i had daniel craig on top of me, i'd be grinning from ear to ear. he looked so good in the james bond movie. it's a great movie...all should go see it!!

jadys said...

What's going on in this shoot? Have Nicole and Daniel done a film together? Why are they in bed looking amorous? If this is just a photo shoot, the concept is fucking stupid.

Elisa said...

Hi guys,
Yup Sylvie, you nailed it right on the head!
They photoshopped everything (including craig's arm) except his face. bad mistake.
love,
elisa