NealK said...
I think you might be jumping to conclusions this time. Clearly she's suffering from kidney stones.
Saturday, October 08, 2005
Art editor strikes again
Looks like I spoke too soon. I swear...there's something sabotage-y going on with these covers lately...everyone looks awful/strange on them...while the rest of the shoot looks fine. This is going beyond an anti-Aniston stance... this is hitting actually talented/beautiful people now!
NealK said...
I think you might be jumping to conclusions this time. Clearly she's suffering from kidney stones.
NealK said...
I think you might be jumping to conclusions this time. Clearly she's suffering from kidney stones.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
beautiful, but not talented! she's expressionless/emotionless in every part she plays! she nearly wrecked Garden State!
I think you might be jumping to conclusions this time. Clearly she's suffering from kidney stones.
ANNERS!! How dare you! Her incredible hotness excludes from any kind of fallibility!
NealK...you HONESTLY have me laughing out loud...that's so true...
actually anners...I think the fact that she went to college and is beautiful has clouded my judgement...when I think of it...I've only seen her in the Professional (little kid...doesn't count), and Star Wars (where she was awful)...hmmm
love,
elisa
Ooh I'm on the main page it's like I'm famous!
Thank you sweety I aim to please.
If Gwyneth Paltry is excused from being called utterly shite because of her "Beauty"(HA!) I think Nat gets a get out of jail free card. She can do no wrong!! Come to me Nat, come to NealK!
yeah...and if Jennifer Aniston is the "woman most women want to look like" then Natalie is totally off the hook.
love,
elisa
my gosh...there is like...no news to report.
except for the raccoon-eye thing and and strangly twisted posture, I don't think she's looks that bad.
wait, didn't she just have a shaved head like yesterday? what happened? is that a wig?
nealk - funny. and true .
I know, I know...she went to school. But my friend studied with her at Hebrew Uni (in Israel) and I'm not sure how often she went to class...and yes, she's stunningly beautiful and I would pay good money (if i had any) to look like her, but she is still talentless in the acting department. Sorry...for the run-on sentence!
She is very beautiful and I first saw her in 'Beautiful Girls' where she was by far the youngest and the most talented. I remember reading a few years ago in GQ magazine and they were actually counting down on their calendar to when she reached legal age of consent. I thought that was pretty funny.
I thought she was terrible in Garden State. Annoying, and just totally wrong for that role. Unwatchable.
Hmm..I want to watch Garden State....I've only seen the trailer...but I have to admit the part where she makes weird noises kind of had me thinking that maybe I shouldn't shell out to see it...I'm sooo picky with movies :)
I've seen hundreds and only like around 10-ish.
love,
elisa
I remember seeing her as a teenager in "The Professional" and "Beautiful Girls" and thought she was talented and beautiful and all that other stuff and remember saying she was going to be a huge adult star...BUT...after seeing her adult work I've come to the conclusion that she's not much of an actress, pretty much every role is played the same. I saw "Closer" on TV the other day and she was playing a stripper and she displayed no spark whatsoever. I much prefer her British doppleganger Keira Knightley.
Of course in Hollywood as long as you're thin and pretty, talent is not neccessary (look at "Oscar-Winner" Gwyneth Paltrow for proof).
^Ouch! Too funny!
yeah...I've got to see "Closer" and be able to judge better then...going by Star Wars though (oh dear...)
yeah Jack...I'm actually still bitter about the Gwyneth win...so undeserved...if she had won it for Emma...I wouldn't have been upset...but for Shakespeare in Love of all things!!! Such a sweet movie...but I simply cannot get through it with her pouting about "acting".
love,
elisa
Post a Comment